Debka report, so take with a grain of salt. The basic gist seems possible, though - there may be an attack inside the US in the next month or so. It's smelling like it.
Watch your collective asses, keep alert to possible threats in your area.
(Hey, it's been a while since I wrote a post or letter like this; I guess that Iraq has been good at drawing fire, if nothing else.)
You don't know me from Eve, but I found you through a friend of a friend (me -> phredward -> gleemie -> you) and I like your politics (I'm also a fairly left-of-center American crossed with a slightly right-of-center Israeli) so I hope you don't mind if I friend you.
Oh yes, my name is actually Maayan. The username is a (bad) joke about what I do for a living. Hi!
I'm at Carnegie Mellon, in the Robotics Institute. I work on communication for multi-agent teams. Right now, I'm not doing anything with physical robots -- it's all in simulation. I'm hoping to keep it that way (I'm a 5th-year and I'd like to graduate some time this decade) but my advisors aren't so sure.
> I guess that Iraq has been good at drawing fire, if nothing else.
This has gotten me thinking.
I saw a report about suicide bombers that seems to imply that occupying a country actually creates more suicide bombers. Basically, suicide bombings happen in response to, and only in response to, foreign occupation, and if the suicide bomber wasn't doing the suicide bombing, they'd probably be, you know, doing the local equivalent of hanging out mopily and listening to The Smiths, or whatever depressed kids do.
It's one report, though pretty well-surveyed, but I haven't seen any other reputable reports or studies on it. Also, it was just about suicide bombers, not terrorist attacks in general, so it may not be that important. I wish I had a link. Lemme see if I can find it.
The idea, though, that going after terrorists creates more terrorism is kind of the opposite of the "draw fire to Iraq" idea (which kind of assumes or implies there's a limited amount of terrorism, which will happen in one place or another)
I agree; if nothing else, suicide bombing is really only effective in limited situations, and if the target is far away it's not worth it.
The line about "drawing fire" was meant very facetiously; it's been much more effective as a training ground for much more professional and experienced terrorists than anything else.
August 15 2005, 16:25:19 UTC 10 years ago
August 15 2005, 17:26:12 UTC 10 years ago
August 15 2005, 18:07:56 UTC 10 years ago
Oh yes, my name is actually Maayan. The username is a (bad) joke about what I do for a living. Hi!
August 15 2005, 18:10:28 UTC 10 years ago
August 15 2005, 18:12:15 UTC 10 years ago
August 15 2005, 18:15:19 UTC 10 years ago
August 15 2005, 19:42:09 UTC 10 years ago
August 15 2005, 19:53:52 UTC 10 years ago
August 15 2005, 21:24:17 UTC 10 years ago
August 16 2005, 07:00:49 UTC 10 years ago
(I did mine in physics, which is a great field for spending forever in the lab)
August 15 2005, 22:47:44 UTC 10 years ago
This has gotten me thinking.
I saw a report about suicide bombers that seems to imply that occupying a country actually creates more suicide bombers. Basically, suicide bombings happen in response to, and only in response to, foreign occupation, and if the suicide bomber wasn't doing the suicide bombing, they'd probably be, you know, doing the local equivalent of hanging out mopily and listening to The Smiths, or whatever depressed kids do.
It's one report, though pretty well-surveyed, but I haven't seen any other reputable reports or studies on it. Also, it was just about suicide bombers, not terrorist attacks in general, so it may not be that important. I wish I had a link. Lemme see if I can find it.
The idea, though, that going after terrorists creates more terrorism is kind of the opposite of the "draw fire to Iraq" idea (which kind of assumes or implies there's a limited amount of terrorism, which will happen in one place or another)
August 15 2005, 22:51:19 UTC 10 years ago
http://www.amconmag.com/2005_07_18/arti
It's published in a magazine for anti-war conservatives. The survey was made by Robert Pape at the University of Chicago.
August 15 2005, 22:53:09 UTC 10 years ago
The line about "drawing fire" was meant very facetiously; it's been much more effective as a training ground for much more professional and experienced terrorists than anything else.
August 18 2005, 01:18:08 UTC 10 years ago